WAN virtualization, what is it and how will it effect your organization?

The term “virtualization” has been historically used for describing technologies where a group of physical assets are intelligently managed by a software layer for a simpler, more efficient and better performing presentation of the resources to the higher layers. As an example server virtualization is the technology that describes the overlay software layer on top of many servers (or alternatively creating multiple virtual instances from a single server) that presents a simple interface to the applications that utilize it.

A similar concept has emerged in the WAN (Wide Area Networks) space, where an intelligence/management WAN virtualization layer (Broadband Bonding appliance) on top of the real WAN resources (DSL, Cable, T1, MPLS etc.) will provide a simple, higher performance IP pipe to the applications that are using the Internet connectivity. With Wan virtualization (Broadband Bonding) various number of Internet lines can be bonded into a single connection. This provides faster connectivity (the sum of all the line speeds) as well as an intelligent management of the latency within the tunnel. WAN Virtualization / Broadband Bonding is quickly becoming a must have technology tool for any IT manager or business owner in today’s cloud based (public and private)  information technology business world we live in.

Here is excerpt from a recent Network World article:

“We predict that managed services of this ilk, combining multiple connections from one or more service providers to create a single, faster, more robust virtual connection will become commonplace–especially as enterprises increasingly rely on mission-critical applications in the cloud that must always be available and perform well.”

 

Video streaming over bonded 3G 4G wireless for command and control vehicles

When it comes to Internet reliability for command and control vehicles for emergency response, Broadband Bonding is a must have technology for the most reliable Internet. Government Computer News’ William Jackson recently had a chance to talk to Paulding County (Paulding Couny case study) who knows how Broadband Bonding can make a big difference when it comes to reliable Internet for 3G bonding for both data as well as video over bonded 3G /4G.

Here is a snippet:

When the command vehicle was first put into service more than two years ago, “we were relying on a Sprint card connected to a laptop to provide most of our connectivity,” said Maj. Kevin New, from Paulding County. “It just wasn’t doing it” in situations in which there could be as many as five computers operating in the vehicle at a time.

By tying three cellular channels together through a PortaBella mobile appliance from Mushroom Networks, “it gives us quite a bit of bandwidth,” New said.

Operation of the PortaBella is simple: There are USB ports for up to four cellular data cards, and a single Ethernet port to provide the bonded link. The tricky part is binding the four channels in an intelligent way so that they act as one pipe.

Source: GCN (http://s.tt/1bLTg)

Cahit Akin, CEO, Mushroom Networks, Inc. 

http://www.mushroomnetworks.com

Broadband Bonding is a cost effective alternative to MPLS for branch office WANs

Yesterday at Interop, I had a chance to chat with Tech Target’s editor Tessa Parmenter about MPLS, how broadband bonding and WAN virtualization is starting to change the MPLS landscape and how it is reshaping the branch office connectivity. More specifically she asked me about if Mushroom Networks’ Broadband Bonding can be called a WAN aggregation or WAN virtualization technology and how this new approach of combining various Internet lines into a single IP connection will effect the MPLS deployments with respect to the Internet failover reliability and the high 9s availability for enterprise WAN networks that are broadband bonding DSL, T1, Cable or any other broadband Internet connection.

Here is snippet from my interview:

“Rising costs and movement toward the cloud have enterprises seriously considering broadband to transport corporate data and even replace MPLS. Vendors like Mushroom Networks are offering WAN aggregation and virtualization technologies to get the highest reliability out of these unreliable WAN links.”

The full video interview is here:

http://searchenterprisewan.techtarget.com/video/Mushroom-Networks-Broadband-Bonding-aids-enterprises-at-Interop-2012

Cahit Akin, CEO, Mushroom Networks, Inc. 

http://www.mushroomnetworks.com

How to reduce WAN latency for real-time applications such as voice, video and other chatty interactive apps?

My blog post about VoIP reliability got a lot of interest, so I wanted to talk a little bit more about the finer details and the larger real-time application set, namely, voice, video and other interactive chatty applications. Even though they all have their own unique WAN requirements (and therefore challenges), the common theme between voice, video and chatty applications is the need for a reliable and low-latency IP tunnel.

Let’s take an example of an enterprise that is doing a VoIP implementation based on an IP-PBX in their head-office/data-center and have their branch offices connect to the PBX via the branch office WAN links. This application requires a low-latency reliable connectivity between the branch offices and the head-quarter office. (This exact same setup applies for a small standalone office where the IP-PBX is a hosted PBX and their SIP trunks at their ASP (Application Service Provider), in that case their WAN link from the office to their service provider needs to have low-latency and needs to be reliable). The challenge is clear, if the brach office network is down, their phones are down… A new type of WAN optimization that goes beyond caching and compression is required.

Historically, the primary challenge of VoIP over POTS (Plain Old Telephone Service) has been the lack of five 9s reliability of VoIP and the lower quality as a result of uncontrolled transport (in the above scenario, the WAN link connecting the branch office to the head-office/data-center or their VoIP ASP). A primary contributor to this unreliability is the WAN links that carry the VoIP traffic. By its nature, Internet Protocol doesn’t guarantee the delivery of the packets within a certain time period. WAN lines can drop, they sometimes have spikes in latency – we all live through these well known issues. If one WAN link not just quite there in terms of performance, being able to bond several WAN links will not only provide the required bandwidth for all applications, including VoIP for more simultaneous calls, but will also provide the high 9s reliability that VoIP, video and other chatty interactive applications desperately need. With various WAN connections with varying latency metrics, all you need is a real-time broadband bonding WAN optimizer network box that bonds the available links that takes advantage of the lowest latency available in the bonded pipe with dynamic resource allocation, auto-failover and advanced QoS.

Next week, Mushroom Networks will be showcasing the Broadband Bonding technologies and its Internet bonding devices at booth #2352 during Interop trade-show in Las Vegas. This is the new tunnel addition to the Internet bonding devices by Mushroom Networks that serves enterprises of all sizes.

VoIP is just one type of interactive application that requires low-latency. The same requirements apply for other chatty applications where the branch office employee is accessing the servers in the public or private cloud (e.g. citrix, terminal, sharepoint etc). Similarly, the Real-Time Broadband Bonding enables a low-latency reliable tunnel between the client and the server for any type of chatty applications.

How to maximize WAN reliability when connecting to data center?

WAN connectivity to your data-center is becoming more important than ever as most of services are moving to the cloud. For security, usually Internet firewalls are good enough to keep the major security threads away, but how about the unintended harms of downtime? Reliability is key when it comes to web services and SAAS type applications. Legacy load-balancing router or link load-balancing was usually implemented to have a primitive level of reliability. However with the invention of Broadband Bonding, which in essence can be described as the next generation load balancing, the reliability can be pushed to the level of application continuity.

Here is an excerpt from my guest post at Data Center Post:

Broadband Bonding™ is a solution that allows a business to aggregate various Internet connections into a single high-speed connection with built-in Internet redundancy. It effectively blends the best attributes of different types of connections (DSL, Cable, and T-1, fiber) to reach higher upload and download speeds and lowest possible latency. Most operations still rely on older connection technologies, with employees commonly reporting faster download and application speeds when using their home Internet service. The substantial cost benefit for Broadband Bonding is it can be implemented transparently on existing lines, without any additional software or hardware beyond the bonding appliance.

When used in a data center environment, Broadband Bonding solves a key pain point for enterprises that need to connect various branch offices for VPN, cloud or virtualized computing services. Currently, most branch offices still rely on notoriously slow T-1 lines to connect to the data center. Although reliable, legacy T-1 cannot handle the deluge of real-time traffic and SaaS services that are now commonplace in businesses.

Once implemented, Broadband Bonding enables speedy connections between the office and the data center; it’s a high-availability service that allows faster file transfers, low-latency transport with advanced quality of service capabilities. It works by intelligently and dynamically managing any number of different broadband providers as a single pipe of connectivity. Older attempts at bonding multiple access lines together failed because solutions were not able to account for lines that functioned at varying performance levels, but new networking techniques such as Virtual Leased Line that is based on Network Calculus have solved this issue…

You can read the full article here.

Wireless video streaming empowering artists

Today at NAB (National Association for Broadcasters) show, Mushroom Networks is announcing a new live video streaming product over bonded 3G or 4G cellular, the Streamer PRO. Streamer PRO is capable of connecting directly to a video camera through industry standard interfaces. The built-in h.264 adaptive encoder will encode the video signal anywhere from CIF resolution to HD quality and transmit the video over bonded cellular data cards. The aggregation of wireless cards establishes a highly reliable and fast Internet connection for uninterrupted and high quality video streaming to any video server (or CDN, Content Delivery Network) possible to stream to many viewers on the web.

This new solution brings live video capability to many applications including artists. Mushroom Networks is proud to be the official Corporate sponsor of the Riley Grace project Enabling a young artist to reach a live fan base has brought the Music and Technology World together empowering both parties to reach a live audience. It has been an absolute blast to work with such a bright and talented young star and her team. The team being local to us in Orange County has helped Mushroom Networks as a technology provider, understand how vital our live streaming tool is in reaching a live audience. This exposure has pushed Mushroom Networks engineering team even farther in their pursuit of delivering an excellent live video experience to the viewer and users. It is our pleasure to be part of the Riley Grace project, we enjoy her great music and providing the technology that helps her bring that amazing sound to her fans. We look forward to others innovative and creative artists following in her footsteps. To hear the latest release by Riley and to down load her new track “Wicked Ways” go to www.rileygrace.com click on the music tab ,click  wicked ways, then buy now click confirm track and enter coupon code “rileygrace” and enjoy.

Can you load balance 3G/4G or is bonding 3G/4G the only way?

If you are OK with old load balancing technologies that limit the aggregate speed to only one of your WAN links, you can probably live with a load-balancing router if you are load-balancing DSL. Although you still have to suffer the loss of the session / application anytime there is a link failure on your wired WAN links. However, if you are trying aggregation of 3G 4G based wireless WAN connections, can you get away with simple load-balancing or do you need intelligent 3G 4G bonding technologies such as Broadband Bonding? The short answer is an astounding MUST have bonding as load-balancing will not cut it for any serious applications.

The reason is simple: cellular links are prone to fluctuations of the RF (Radio Frequency) characteristics because of fast and slow fading phenomena that is created by the inherent nature of the channel, in this case the ether; with all types of unpredictable obstacles such as trees, building, hills and valleys. Because of this wild unavoidable RF characteristics, the cellular WAN links will always have built-in large range of variation which will swing from peak rates to slow rates over very short time periods, usually within seconds or smaller. If one tries to load-balance, i.e. assign a single session (say a file transfer) to only one of the available 3G 4G links via a load-balancing device, there is a good chance that session can get stuck on a 3G/4G card that will not have good channel characteristics at that very moment – you are at best shooting in the dark. So with load-balancing you may even end-up hurting the performance compared to a single card.

The only viable approach for  bonding 3G 4G wireless cellular links is to utilize “Network Calculus”, a theory that was introduced by Prof. Rene Cruz decades ago, that groundbreaking research enabled the modeling and prediction of highly varying channels via broadband bonding. By leveraging Network Calculus, a Broadband Bonding algorithm can bond 3G 4G data cards in such a way that the wild fluctuations can be shielded from any of the specific IP traffic. This results in a much more predictable, reliable and fast connectivity as a direct result of intelligent aggregation of wireless cards and therefore provide much better end-user experience. This technology is so powerful that it even enables live video streaming over the bonded cellular 3G 4G cards in very challenging mobile environments. Would you like to see some sample videos to experience Network Calculus in action?

Cahit Akin, CEO, Mushroom Networks, Inc. 

http://www.mushroomnetworks.com

What is the difference between a link load balancer and a broadband bonding (link bonding) router?

The main distinction between any of the load balancing devices and a broadband bonding (or link bonding) router is that the broadband bonding provides link bonding for data transfers. With link bonding, the access links are effectively combined together into a single virtual pipe so that the data transfer rate of the virtual pipe is the sum of the data transfer rates of the access links that are being combined. Load balancing devices simply distribute load at the granularity of session. For example, if a user within the local network downloads a file, it generates a server request that is sent out over a single Internet access line. As a result, the file download will only use a single Internet access line, even though the other available Internet access lines may be idle. This is primarily how the load-balancers and load balancing routers operate.

So in summary, with broadband bonding you get the full combined speed of all of the links, with link load balancers you only get the speed of one link. Here is a white-paper listed in this link named “LBR vs Bonding”

Cahit Akin, CEO, Mushroom Networks, Inc. 

http://www.mushroomnetworks.com

ADSL bonding done right – how can DSL aggregation be done without telco coordination

For more than a decade, large carriers and ISPs that own twisted copper plant have looked at layer1 and layer2 based ADSL bonding technologies such as MLPPP (Multi Link Point-to-Point Protocol). MLPPP or similar layer1/layer2/layer2.5 based legacy bonding protocols never became practical because of several inherent shortcomings of the technology. For starters, it required a forklift upgrade at the telco POP, i.e. the DSLAM with the new DSLAM card that supports MLPPP, which meant high upfront cost. This upgrade needed for every small coverage area of a DSLAM that was planned for bonded ADSL service offering, i.e. a one-to-one upgrade on the server side. The second shortcoming of the legacy DSL bonding was the fact that because of the variations in the DSL line performances, the DSL bonding efficiency was usually very low, where in some instances forcing the bonding algorithms to choke to the level of the lowest common denominator of the DSL lines.

However in the recent years with the introduction of Broadband Bonding, the ADSL bonding approach has discovered its new life since both of the limitations were practically eliminated with the move towards bonding at layer3 and above. What this type of DSL bonding, namely Broadband Bonding, enables is that the peering unit that required to be at the DSLAM with legacy methods, can now be moved anywhere in the Internet (since bonding is done at a routable layer now) and therefore the one-to-one requirement of the legacy DSL bonding is eliminated. In effect the telco can install a single (or few) peering DSL bonding Broadband Bonding server units in a few of their POPs, say in their data-centers and can have a DSL rollout in very large geographical regions without the upfront cost. Similarly, since the algorithms are adaptive and agile in Broadband Bonding, the performance is also been improved drastically. Add on top of this the intelligence of the higher layers providing additional QoS functionality and you end up with a practical DSL bonding technology, also known as Broadband Bonding. Here is a case-study of an ISP that implemented Broadband Bonding for T1 and DSL bonding. As the case study explains, the capex for the rollout was minimal.

The beneficial implication of the higher layer Broadband Bonding solutions is that there is no telco / carrier coordination involved. Anyone can create their own bonded ADSL WAN connection without requiring installation by the carrier. Enterprises can deploy bonded DSL in their branch offices cost effectively by just using Broadband Bonding devices. They can even mix and match ISPs to add further diversity and reliability, but that topic deserves its own write-up…

Cahit Akin, CEO, Mushroom Networks, Inc. 

http://www.mushroomnetworks.com

New traffic filtering, traffic shaping and monitoring engine added to the Truffle Internet bonding devices

Truffle already had a very powerful QoS and firewall built-in. The new module features enhanced controls, allowing visibility, filtering and classification of traffic via application-aware layer 7 deep-packet inspection filters with a built-in library of hundreds of application identifiers. It enables traffic to be placed into various priority levels, including classifications of mission critical traffic such as VPN, video, VOIP or cloud-based business applications with pinpoint control of minimum guaranteed bandwidth, maximum allowed bandwidth and priority levels on a per application, user or flow basis. Traffic can be custom shaped to allow for guaranteed bandwidth for desired applications, as well as the ability to limit or block recreational or malicious traffic. The presentation layer provides graphical visibility into application traffic, network characteristics such as utilization, response times and overall connection and performance profiles. Check some of the features here: http://www.mushroomnetworks.com/products.aspx?product_id=1000&tab=features

 

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.